Dover Conveyor & Equipment Co. v. Ohio Savings & Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Wisconsin could not exclude psychiatric evidence on issue of mens rea while accepting psychiatric evidence on many other issues
• “rules which exclude relevant evidence which is not competent are permissible”
• \rules which exclude relevant evidence which is not competent are permissible\
• aff'g 440 F.Supp. 1272 (E.D.Wis.1977)
• aff’g 440 F.Supp. 1272 (E.D.Wis.1977)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).