Dove v. Rose Acre Farms, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the doctrine of substantial performance did not apply to an employee bonus agreement where the employee violated the bonus agreement’s tardiness and absenteeism rules which was an essential condition of the bonus agreement.
• noting that a provision, under which one absence or tardy would result in a forfeiture of the bonus, was well known to Dove, as was the strict application of it
• “An employee is not entitled to a bonus until after the time stipulated in the contract for its payment, or until other conditions designated in the contract for its payment have been fulfilled . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).