Dove v. Boseman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the ALJ’s adverse credibility finding was not patently wrong, particularly without any medical opinion stating that the claimant’s “symptoms were more severe than the ALJ acknowledged”
• “ALJ did not explain how [claimant's] daily activities undermine the credibility of her complaints, and such conclusion is not self-evident.”
• “ALJ did not explain how [claimant’s] daily activities undermine the credibility of her complaints, and such conclusion is not self-evident.”
• a claimant “needs to be able to perform only one of her past relevant jobs in order to be considered not disabled.”
• “Although a claimant can still be found disabled while collecting unemployment benefits or looking for work…an ALJ may take this factor into account in assessing the subjective complaints of disability….”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).