Dousevicz, Inc. CU and Site Plan Approval - Decision on Motion

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the claimed invention nonobvious in view of post-filing evidence of an unexpected property not disclosed in the specification, while noting that the evidence “[wa]s directed to that which ‘would inherently flow’ from what was originally disclosed”
• holding the claimed invention nonobvious in view of post-filing evidence of an unexpected property not disclosed in the specification, while noting that the evidence \[wa]s directed to that which `would inherently flow' from what was originally disclosed\
• allowing an unexpected result to overcome an obviousness rejection where the improved result “ ‘inherently flow[ed]’ from what was originally disclosed [in the patent application]”
• allowing an unexpected result to overcome an obviousness rejection where the improved result \`inherently flow[ed]' from what was originally disclosed [in the patent application]\
• reliance on an unexpected property not disclosed in the application may be entitled to weight if “directed to that which would inherently flow from what was originally disclosed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).