Douglass v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that lawsuits on behalf of an estate must be brought unanimously by coexecutors
• beneficiary of will lacked standing to maintain ejectment because title of property remained with estate
• beneficiary of will lacked standing to maintain ejectment because title of property remained with estate
• beneficiary of will lacked standing to maintain ejectment because title of property remained with estate
• “An action filed on behalf of the estate must be brought by the executors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cadle Co. v. Shabani
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2008-09-05· cited 53×
• The Cadle Co. v. Shabani
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2006-07-28· cited 30×
• Sanchez v. McKinney
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2011-05-27· cited 29×
• Estate of Chism v. Eldridge (In Re Eldridge)
  N.D. Alabama· 2006-08-30· cited 6×
• Gunter v. Gunter
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2005-04-22· cited 3×
• Richard W. Bentley v. Leslie L. Bentley
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2023-04-21

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stone v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1988-08-05· cited 8×
• Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. Moore
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1984-05-09· cited 3×