Skip to main content
· 9/25/2000

Douglas Y. Tester, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Annie Ruth Tester, Deceased v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company

Citations

  • 228 F.3d 372
  • 25 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1052
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 23724

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to use the definition of “active work” to define “active” while interpreting substantively similar policy language
  • holding, under materially identical Reliance policy provision, that employee who had been on medical leave for five weeks before death was covered because she \was working for [the employer] on a regular basis and . . . was simply out sick when she died\
  • finding Reliance's interpretation of the term \active\ leads to an absurd result
  • considering 20 continued paychecks relevant to determining reasonable expectations of employee
  • \Reliance's construction of the term 'active' does not eliminate the ambiguity . . . because it unreasonably restricts coverage to the time that an employee is actually at work.\
  • interpreting accidental death insurance policy with similar language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Widener, Williams, Michael

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.