Douglas W. Schwenk v. James Hartford Steve Sinclair Robert Mitchell,opinion

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a transgender individual could state a claim under the Gender Motivated Violence Act under the reasoning of Price Waterhouse
• holding that a transgender individual could state a claim under the Gender Motivated Violence Act under the reasoning of Price Waterhouse
• holding that a transgender individual could state a claim under the Gender Motivated Violence Act under the reasoning of Price Waterhouse
• holding that a transgender plaintiff could state a claim under the Gender Motivated Violence Act based on Price Waterhouse
• stating that “[a] sexual assault on an inmate by a guard . . . is deeply offensive to human dignity”
• establishing that prisoners have an Eighth Amendment right “to be free from sexual abuse[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).