· 3/31/2014
Douglas v. Niklas
Citations
- 212 F. Supp. 3d 107
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that due to ERISA preemption, \New Jersey's concepts of equity cannot be applied and a QDRO cannot be entered after the fact\
- noting that “[n]o federal case has allowed a QDRO to be entered after a participant’s death”
- rejecting arguments that benefits vest in either the beneficiary's ex-wife or current wife and dividing benefits on other grounds
- surviving spouse who participated fully in family court proceedings disputing ex-spouse’s claim to retirement benefits was bound by family court’s judgment notwithstanding the fact that she was not formally a party to the action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bates
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.