Skip to main content
· 3/31/2014

Douglas v. Niklas

Citations

  • 212 F. Supp. 3d 107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that due to ERISA preemption, \New Jersey's concepts of equity cannot be applied and a QDRO cannot be entered after the fact\
  • noting that “[n]o federal case has allowed a QDRO to be entered after a participant’s death”
  • rejecting arguments that benefits vest in either the beneficiary's ex-wife or current wife and dividing benefits on other grounds
  • surviving spouse who participated fully in family court proceedings disputing ex-spouse’s claim to retirement benefits was bound by family court’s judgment notwithstanding the fact that she was not formally a party to the action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.