Skip to main content
· 11/23/1909

Douglas v. Hanbury

Citations

  • 56 Wash. 63
  • 104 P. 1110
  • 1909 Wash. LEXIS 846

Syllabus

<p>Vendor and Purchaser — Contract—Forfeiture—Default in Payment — Waiver. Where seventeen monthly installments on a -land contract were paid and accepted from a few days to a few months after maturity, the vendors waive a provision making time of the essence of the contract, and a forfeiture could not thereafter be declared without demand for payment or specific notice.</p> <p>Same — Notice of Forfeiture — Sufficiency. After waiver of a provision making time of the essence of a contract to convey land, testimony by the vendor that he mailed a letter notifying the vendee of an installment falling due, and that he must be ready with the money, is not sufficient to show notice of a specific intent to declare a forfeiture, receipt of the letter being denied.</p>

Judges: Rudkin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.