Douglas v. Hackney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he only stated mandatory requirements of the product-line exception in Pennsylvania [are] the three Ray factors[.]”
• bystanders who witnessed relatives killed and/or injured by defective product allowed to recover under Section 402A for emotional distress even though they suffered no physical injuries
• judgment notwithstanding the verdict denied on same product line element to defendant successor corporation that produced “fire wagons” with alterations as compared to the injury causing fire truck
• bystanders who witnessed relatives killed and/or injured by [a] defective [fire hose] allowed to recover under [Second Restatement] Section 402A for emotional distress even though they suffered no physical injuries
• adopting the trial court's reasoning as its own

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).