· 6/22/2011
Douglas-Slade v. LaHood
Citations
- 793 F. Supp. 2d 82
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66151
- 2011 WL 2469592
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that Title VII “creates only a cause of action for discrimination, not an 17 independent cause of action for the mishandling of an employee’s discrimination 18 complaints” (citation modified)
- dismissing Title VII claim because plaintiff had merely alleged “errors and irregularities with respect to the investigation of her discrimination claims at the administrative level”
- finding same regarding alleged “errors and irregularities with respect to the investigation of [plaintiff’s] discrimination claims at the administrative level”
- leave restriction not adverse for retaliation claim where plaintiff was required to obtain approval from her employer in advance to take leave
- plaintiff marked AWOL for one day failed to state a retaliation claim because she did not show materially adverse effects on the conditions of her employment or discouragement from bringing an EEO complaint
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ellen Segal Huvelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.