Skip to main content
· 6/22/2011

Douglas-Slade v. LaHood

Citations

  • 793 F. Supp. 2d 82
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66151
  • 2011 WL 2469592

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that Title VII “creates only a cause of action for discrimination, not an 17 independent cause of action for the mishandling of an employee’s discrimination 18 complaints” (citation modified)
  • dismissing Title VII claim because plaintiff had merely alleged “errors and irregularities with respect to the investigation of her discrimination claims at the administrative level”
  • finding same regarding alleged “errors and irregularities with respect to the investigation of [plaintiff’s] discrimination claims at the administrative level”
  • leave restriction not adverse for retaliation claim where plaintiff was required to obtain approval from her employer in advance to take leave
  • plaintiff marked AWOL for one day failed to state a retaliation claim because she did not show materially adverse effects on the conditions of her employment or discouragement from bringing an EEO complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellen Segal Huvelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.