Skip to main content
· 7/29/1988

Douglas Shaw v. United States of America and Thomas Boender, an Individual

Citations

  • 854 F.2d 360
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10080
  • 1988 WL 77444

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that fact that service member was on post and on his way to work was directly connected to military service
  • discussing a claimant’s receipt of military medical treatment and disability benefits as implicating the second Feres rationale
  • discussing claimant’s duty status in the incident to service analysis
  • discussing the first Feres rationale

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKay, Seymour, Baldock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.