Skip to main content
· 4/3/2013

Douglas Reuter v. Jax Ltd., Inc.

Citations

  • 711 F.3d 918
  • 2013 WL 1316334
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 6672

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that leave to amend may be denied for futility
  • noting that futility is a sufficient reason to deny leave to amend
  • reviewing denial of leave to amend for abuse of discretion and question of futility de novo
  • reviewing denial of leave to amend for abuse of discretion and question of futility de novo
  • listing “undue delay, bad faith, or dilatory motive, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the non-moving party, or futility of amendment” as reasons to deny leave to amend
  • standard of review; district court may deny leave to amend complaint if amendment would be futile

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Bye, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.