Douglas M. Grimes v. William (Bill) Smith, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ֻ§ 1985(3) does not reach conspiracies motivated by economic or commercial concerns
• “[L]iability under § 1986 is derivative of § 1985(3) liability; without a violation of § 1985(3), there can be no violation of § 1986.”
• “[L]iability under § 1986 is derivative of § 1985(3) liability; without a violation of § 1985(3), there can be no violation of § 1986.” (internal citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).