· 7/14/1992
Douglas Klett v. Robert Pim John Humphrey J. Dennis Roach United States of America
Citations
- 965 F.2d 587
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- treating an order as no longer in effect for purposes of sanctions once it has become moot
- finding the “plain meaning” of the contempt statute, 18 U.S.C. § 401, “prevents a federal court from imposing a sanction for contempt of another court’s injunction”
- “The plain meaning 17 of [18 U.S.C. § 401] prevents a federal court from imposing a sanction for contempt of another 18 court’s injunction.”
- “The violation of a federal statute or administrative regulation by an agency of the United States does not, standing alone, create a cause of action under the FTCA.”’
- “The violation of a federal statute or administrative regulation by an agency of the United States does not, standing alone, create a cause of action under the FTCA.”
- “Federally imposed obligations, whether general or specific, are irrelevant to [the] inquiry under the FTCA, unless state law imposes a similar obligation upon private persons.” (cleaned up and citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arnold, Magill, Larson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.