Skip to main content
· 7/14/1992

Douglas Klett v. Robert Pim John Humphrey J. Dennis Roach United States of America

Citations

  • 965 F.2d 587

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • treating an order as no longer in effect for purposes of sanctions once it has become moot
  • finding the “plain meaning” of the contempt statute, 18 U.S.C. § 401, “prevents a federal court from imposing a sanction for contempt of another court’s injunction”
  • “The plain meaning 17 of [18 U.S.C. § 401] prevents a federal court from imposing a sanction for contempt of another 18 court’s injunction.”
  • “The violation of a federal statute or administrative regulation by an agency of the United States does not, standing alone, create a cause of action under the FTCA.”’
  • “The violation of a federal statute or administrative regulation by an agency of the United States does not, standing alone, create a cause of action under the FTCA.”
  • “Federally imposed obligations, whether general or specific, are irrelevant to [the] inquiry under the FTCA, unless state law imposes a similar obligation upon private persons.” (cleaned up and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Magill, Larson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.