Douglas Foods Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating restoration order where Board gave no “explanation of its authority to enter such order or [the company’s] ability to carry it out,” and where order seemed to require “forced repurchase of independently owned assets”
• “extensive quotation” is no “substitute[ ]” for “considering] the factors as they apply to the instant case”
• “extensive quotation” is no “substitute[]” for “consider[ing] the factors as they apply to the instant case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).