Skip to main content
· 3/30/2001

Douglas Estrada v. Speno & Cohen, Attorneys at Law Sarah Speno David B. Cohen,defendants-Appellants

Citations

  • 244 F.3d 1050
  • 2001 Daily Journal DAR 3225
  • 49 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 50
  • 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2580
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 5225

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no abuse of discretion in the district court’s failure to consider alternative sanctions where the party thrice failed to attend scheduled hearings
  • federal 5 13 courts have the inherent authority to impose sanctions for bad faith conduct during litigation, or 14 || for willfully ignoring a court order
  • a warning that failure to obey a court order will result in UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 23-4054 PA (MARx
  • “[W]e have held that a judge’s warning to a party 18 that a future failure to obey a court order will result in default judgment can itself suffice to meet 19 the consideration of alternatives requirement.”
  • failure to appear at depositions and court hearings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.