Douglas Estes v. Kentucky Utilities Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no abuse of discretion in allowing defendant to amend its answer to assert affirmative defense of exclusivity of workers’ compensation under Kentucky law
• “The determination of whether ... justice would require the allowance of an amendment to an answer is left to the sound discretion of the district court”
• “The determination of whether. . . justice would require the allowance of an amendment to an answer is left to the sound discretion of the district court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).