Douglas Elliman LLC v. Tal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the party asserting the exception . . . bears the burden of establishing that it applies”
• holding a parent had “easily satisfie[d] the first prong of the capabable-of-repetition-yet-evading-review exception” because “IEPs are short-lived—lasting for only a single school year—and judicial review is not”
• noting, inter alia, that (1) “the ‘wrong’ that is, or is not, ‘capable of repetition’ must be defined in terms of the precise controversy it spawns”; (2) the aggrieved party “may not generally allege that the District will deny [the student] a FAPE at some point in the future”; and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).