Skip to main content
· 2/22/1999

Douglas Dry Rosie Burlison Juanita McConnell v. Cfr Court of Indian Offenses for the Choctaw Nation James Wolfe, Magistrate

Citations

  • 168 F.3d 1207
  • 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 1852
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2669
  • 1999 WL 84866

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding the district court erred in determining that it lacked jurisdiction and remanding for consideration of exhaustion of tribal remedies
  • “A petitioner must satisfy the ‘in custody’ requirement as a prerequisite to habeas corpus jurisdiction.”
  • when presented with a § 1303 petition for habeas relief, the federal court must, in the first instance, determine whether the petitioner has exhausted tribal remedies
  • “We read the ‘detention’ language as being analogous to the ‘in custody’ requirement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brorby, McWilliams, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.