Skip to main content
· 1/19/2005

Douglas Dees v. Helmuth T. Billy, M.D. Gregory E. Ginn, M.D.

Citations

  • 394 F.3d 1290
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 961
  • 2005 WL 95732

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing administrative closures, stating that “[a]n order administratively closing a case is a docket management tool that has no jurisdictional effect’
  • \[A] district court order staying judicial proceedings and compelling arbitration is not appealable even if accompanied by an administrative closing\ because \administratively closing ... has no jurisdictional effect.\
  • ‘An order administratively 10 || closing a case is a docket management tool that has no jurisdictional effect.’’
  • \An order administratively closing a case is a docket management tool that has no jurisdictional effect.\
  • “[a]n order administratively closing a case is a docket management 15 tool that has no jurisdictional effect.”
  • “We therefore hold that a district court order staying judicial 4 proceedings and compelling arbitration is not appealable even if accompanied by an 5 administrative closing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Scannlain, Cowen, Bea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.