Skip to main content
· 3/16/1999

Douglas Christopher Thomas v. John Taylor, Warden, Sussex I State Prison

Citations

  • 170 F.3d 466
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4180
  • 1999 WL 140596

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying discovery request related to claim that failed as a matter of law
  • rejecting petitioner’s efforts to recast a claim concerning the effectiveness of an expert as a Strickland claim
  • finding nothing in record to indicate that trial counsel failed adequately to prepare expert, rather expert himself was unprepared
  • affirming the district court’s denial of evidentiary hearing on actual innocence when peti- tioner’s requested discovery could not establish his actual innocence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ervin, Luttig, King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.