· 9/12/2013
Douglas Brown v. Robert D. Fluharty
Citations
- 231 W. Va. 613
- 748 S.E.2d 809
- 2013 WL 5047376
- 2013 W. Va. LEXIS 915
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that, “[i]nasmuch as this case was decided on a motion for judgment on the pleadings, [pursuant to Rule] 12(c), we . . . take the factual allegations contained in the complaint as true”
- rejecting 3 Neither party asserts that it was error for the circuit court to convert the Administratrix’s motion for judgment on the pleadings into a motion for summary judgment. 4 application of “substantial compliance” principle where testator did not sign will at all
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benjamin, Per Curiam, Wilfong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.