Douglas Blankenship v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, “[i]n some cases, when we reverse convictions or sentences on fewer than all counts, the aggregate sentence must be unbundled” because “the sentences or counts are interrelated or interdependent”
• “[T]he presence of the defendant usually is not required, unless the modification makes the sentence more onerous.”
• “It is a jurisdictional requirement of § 2255 that the conviction and sentence being challenged are final.”
• “In some cases, when we reverse convictions or sentences on fewer than all counts, the aggregate sentence must be unbundled, and the defendant must be resentenced on all counts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).