Douglas Bienvenu v. 1 and 2 87184 C/W John Doe v. 1 and 2 87515

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating a party seeking reformation must prove by clear and convincing evidence that “innocent third parties will not be unfairly affected by reformation of the writing”
• “absent fraud or misrepresentation, estoppel runs in favor only of those who have reasonably relied on another’s conduct or declarations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).