Dougherty v. Haaland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding expert testimony was required on question of safe operation of vessel because it required “fairly specific knowledge” of matters “outside the common knowledge and experience of ordinary persons”
• expert testimony required where “matters clearly lie outside the common knowledge and experience of ordinary persons”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Dougherty v. Haaland
  Third Circuit· 1979-07-17· cited 1×

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Seas Shipping Co. v. Sieracki
  Supreme Court· 1946-05-20· cited 1,489×
• Patzig v. O'Neil
  Third Circuit· 1978-04-17· cited 190×
• Edward C. Denneny and Catherine Denneny v. Bernard Siegel, Louis H. Block and the Albert Einstein Medical Center
  Third Circuit· 1969-04-15· cited 161×
• Ragan v. Steen
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-09-23· cited 100×
• Anthony Munoz v. Flota Merchante Grancolombiana, S.A.
  Second Circuit· 1977-04-25· cited 67×
• Hurst v. Triad Shipping Co.
  Third Circuit· 1977-04-25· cited 67×
• Thomas Brown v. Ivarans Rederi A/s
  Third Circuit· 1976-11-29· cited 51×
• O. T. Brown v. Mitsubishi Shintaku Ginko, a Foreign Corporation, Daninichi Kaiun Kaish, Ltd., a Foreign Corporation
  Fifth Circuit· 1977-04-11· cited 49×
• Robinson v. Wirts
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-12-29· cited 49×
• Milton Marant v. Farrell Lines, Inc.
  Third Circuit· 1977-01-31· cited 45×
• Canizzo v. Farrell Lines, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1978-06-02· cited 42×
• Samuels v. Empresa Lineas Maritimas Argentinas
  Fifth Circuit· 1978-05-26· cited 38×
• Lloyd Wescott v. Impresas Armadoras, S.A. Panama v. Brady Hamilton Stevedore Co., Intervenor-Appellee
  Ninth Circuit· 1977-11-14· cited 33×
• Gallardo v. Westfal-Larsen & Co. A/S
  N.D. California· 1977-06-03· cited 27×
• Unnamed case
  Fifth Circuit· 1977-03-11· cited 23×
• James Davison v. Pacific Inland Navigation Company, Inc., a Washington Corporation, and Mitsubishi International Corporation, a New York Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1978-02-13· cited 21×
• Lawrence Butler v. O/y Finnlines, Ltd., and Enso-Gutzeit O/y
  Fourth Circuit· 1976-06-02· cited 18×
• Blackburn v. Prudential Lines, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1978-07-19· cited 11×
• Davis v. Inca Compania Naviera S.A.
  W.D. Washington· 1977-09-28· cited 9×
• John Briley v. Charente Steamship Company, Ltd.
  Fifth Circuit· 1978-06-01· cited 8×