Skip to main content
· 4/27/1886

Dougherty v. Coffin

Citations

  • 69 Cal. 454
  • 10 P. 672
  • 1886 Cal. LEXIS 667

Syllabus

<p>Street Assessment—Completion of Work—Expiration of Time for— Extension of by Supervisors. —Where the contract time for the completion of the work of grading a street in the city and county of San Francisco has been extended by the board of supervisors, and the extension has expired without the work being completed, the board has no power to further extend the time for its completion.</p> <p>Id.—Protest against Extension—Appeal to Supervisors—Estoppel. — The owners of lots against which the assessment is levied are not estopped from disputing its validity because they protested against the extension and appealed from the assessment to the board of supervisors.</p> <p>Judgment—Reversal — Immaterial Error. —A judgment will not be reversed for a harmless and immaterial error.</p>

Judges: Belcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.