Skip to main content
· 12/3/2010

Doug Y. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services

Citations

  • 243 P.3d 217
  • 2010 Alas. LEXIS 125

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that superior court \did not err in terminating parental rights and not establishing a guardianship\ because it \implicitly rejected the guardianship proposal\ in its best interests analysis
  • noting that visitation is one factor that courts can consider when evaluating reasonable effort
  • affirming OCS had made reasonable efforts despite no visitation and describing significant efforts to provide mental health and parenting assessments
  • affirming termination in case where “[t]he superior court implicitly rejected the guardianship proposal”
  • “The potential that Doug may one day be able to change is not sufficient to suggest, much less prove, that guardianship is in Damien’s best interest.”
  • considering entirety of record in assessing reasonable efforts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Winfree, Christen, Carpeneti, Stowers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.