Doudle v. Gause

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[E]ven if the Respondent intended to remove the children for a maximum of one year, her actions since 2000 have exceeded the scope of Petitioner’s consent and she is wrongfully retaining the children in the U.S.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).