Skip to main content
· 5/22/1985

Doubleday & Company, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Tony Curtis, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

Citations

  • 763 F.2d 495
  • 11 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2033
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 31289

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the purpose of requiring affirmative defenses to be pleaded in the answer is “to notify a party of the existence of certain issues.”
  • finding that publisher’s thorough review and offers of subsequent help demonstrated good faith
  • stressing that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure “embody the spirit of fairness”
  • where the trial judge based his decision on a theory which would be waived if not pleaded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaufman, Van Graafeiland Lasker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.