· 2/11/1998
DOUBLE D SPOTTING SERVICE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUPERVALU, INC.; World Super Services, Inc., Defendants-Appellees
Citations
- 136 F.3d 554
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 1820
- 1998 WL 51732
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the “ ‘rule of reason’ analysis involves an inquiry into the market structure and the defendant’s market power in order to assess the actual effect of the restraint”
- “Disappointment at not receiving one unloading contract at one particular warehouse is insufficient as a matter of law to rise to the level of an antitrust violation within a relevant market.”
- “Vertical nonprice restrictions are governed by the rule of reason and are not per se violations, because they ‘promote interbrand competition by allowing the manufacturer to achieve certain efficiencies in the distribution of his products.’”
- de novo standard of review for Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) dismissal
- dismissing complaint for failure to plead valid relevant market
- de novo standard of review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arnold, Loken, Hansen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.