Doubet, LLC v. Palermo (In Re Palermo)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under New York law an individual was not a trustee because he never accepted the role
• holding that the debtor’s $2,751,299 obligations are substantial, especially in light of his $5,000 in disclosed assets
• \[D]ebtor must offer 'much more in the way of explanation than vague generalities' \ (quoting In re Sperling, 72 F.2d 259 , 261 (2d Cir. 1934) )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).