Doty v. Frontier Communications, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that federal preemption did not exist and that the state law at issue “if seen as a barrier to a telecommunication carrier’s ability to enter or stay in the market, would appear to fall under the safe harbor of protecting the rights of Kansas consumers”
• “In the absence of express preemption in a federal law, there is a strong presumption that Congress did not intend to displace state law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).