Skip to main content
· 11/4/2013

Dotstry v. United States

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 539
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 386
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3258
  • 571 U.S. 1000
  • 2013 WL 5442910
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 7905

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that Congress’s creation of a statutory right of appeal “does not simply override the re- quirement of injury in fact”
  • holding an agency’s denial of re- quested administrative action is insufficient to confer standing
  • discussing similar provision of the inter partes reexamination statute that preceded the IPR regime
  • first citing Massachusetts v. E.P.A., 549 U.S. 497, 517–18 (2007); and then citing Summers v. Earth Island Inst., 555 U.S. 488, 496 (2009)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.