· 9/10/2009
DOT FOODS v. Washington Dept. of Revenue
Citations
- 215 P.3d 185
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- In discerning legislative intent, this court “cannot add words or clauses to a statute when the legislature has chosen not to include such language.”
- “Because the statute is not ambiguous and we can derive its meaning from its face, we need not turn to legislative history to discern the legislative intent behind the provision.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: C. Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.