Skip to main content
· 9/10/2009

DOT FOODS v. Washington Dept. of Revenue

Citations

  • 215 P.3d 185

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • In discerning legislative intent, this court “cannot add words or clauses to a statute when the legislature has chosen not to include such language.”
  • “Because the statute is not ambiguous and we can derive its meaning from its face, we need not turn to legislative history to discern the legislative intent behind the provision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: C. Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.