Skip to main content
· 7/27/2004

Dost v. State

Citations

  • 812 N.E.2d 232
  • 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 1454
  • 2004 WL 1663046

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that with respect to the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment, “[t]he test is for practical accuracy, and common sense should prevail over hypertechnicality”
  • finding inexact description of home to be searched did not invalidate the warrant under the Fourth Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ratlifef, Riley, Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.