· 7/27/2004
Dost v. State
Citations
- 812 N.E.2d 232
- 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 1454
- 2004 WL 1663046
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that with respect to the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment, “[t]he test is for practical accuracy, and common sense should prevail over hypertechnicality”
- finding inexact description of home to be searched did not invalidate the warrant under the Fourth Amendment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ratlifef, Riley, Baker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.