Skip to main content
· 10/13/1969

Dosskey v. California

Citations

  • 396 U.S. 855

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant’s fruit of poisonous tree argument failed because the search of the car was lawful
  • recognizing that a petitioner must have a “full and fair opportunity to litigate” his claims in state court
  • finding that petitioner had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the search of his vehicle and his subsequent statements were not fruit of the poisonous tree
  • prohibiting the introduction of an affidavit for the first time on federal habeas review after determining that it could have been presented at state court proceedings
  • finding federal habeas petitioner not entitled to merits review where he made a motion to suppress and had a full suppression hearing in state court on his Fourth 5 Amendment claim
  • discussing the level of intoxication necessary to ren- der a confession involuntary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.