· 5/3/1918
Doss v. Howard
Citations
- 180 Ky. 413
- 202 S.W. 888
- 1918 Ky. LEXIS 83
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding in consumer antitrust case that expert's consumer demand model was not admissible but that his supply side analysis satisfied FRE 702
- excluding expert report where its modeling was “largely untethered from the actual facts” of the case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hurt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.