Skip to main content
· 5/3/1918

Doss v. Howard

Citations

  • 180 Ky. 413
  • 202 S.W. 888
  • 1918 Ky. LEXIS 83

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding in consumer antitrust case that expert's consumer demand model was not admissible but that his supply side analysis satisfied FRE 702
  • excluding expert report where its modeling was “largely untethered from the actual facts” of the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hurt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.