Skip to main content
· 7/28/2009

Doss v. Gilkey

Citations

  • 649 F. Supp. 2d 905
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65078
  • 2009 WL 2242677

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a hearing is not required where “there are no disputed facts regarding exhaustion, only a legal question.”
  • explaining that a hearing is not required where “there are no disputed facts regarding exhaustion, only a legal question.”
  • no hearing required where there are “no disputed facts regarding exhaustion, only a legal question”
  • no hearing required where there are “no disputed facts regarding exhaustion, only a legal question”
  • no hearing required where there are “no disputed facts regarding exhaustion, only a legal questions”
  • no hearing required where there are “no disputed facts regarding exhaustion, only a legal questions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: J. Phil Gilbert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.