Doseung Chung v. New York Racing Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff failed to satisfy prima facie case where plaintiff failed to “identif[y] a proper comparator”
• noting that it is the plaintiff’s burden to identify a specific proper comparator
• affirming summary judgment where plaintiff disagreed with supervisor’s assessment of her communication skills but offered no contrary evidence
• affirming summary judgment where plaintiff disagreed with supervisor’s assessment of her communication skills but offered no contrary evidence
• affirming summary judgment where sole evidence of pretext was plaintiff’s disagreement with supervisor’s assessment
• the fact that plaintiff disagreed with her supervisor’s assessment of poor communication skills does not establish pretext when the plaintiff offered no contrary evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).