Dorsey v. Morgan Stanley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “mere speculation” that employee unduly influenced employer’s action is “insufficient to overcome summary judgment”
• noting that “mere speculation” that employee No. 06-3251 11 unduly influenced employer’s action is “insufficient to overcome summary judgment”
• finding \inferences that are supported by only speculation or conjecture will not defeat a summary judgment motion.\
• finding adverse retaliatory action where employee was asked to \either accept a lower position at another branch or resign\
• \[I]nferences that are supported by only speculation or conjecture will not defeat a summary judgment motion.\
• “[I]nferences that are supported by only speculation or conjecture will not defeat a summary judgment motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).