Dorsey v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• doctor’s written certification that the claimant could not work because of her pregnancy was admissible because she had an opportunity to detail the facts surrounding the submission and preparation of the report

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Carter v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-04-01· cited 10×
• Petty v. University of Delaware
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1982-08-31· cited 7×
• Estate of Fells ex rel. Boulding v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-12-15· cited 6×
• Northern Health Facilities v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-07-31· cited 6×
• Cicco v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-08-03· cited 6×
• Pifer v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-03-30· cited 5×
• Permagrain Products, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-06-11

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Walker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-12-13· cited 330×
• Fessman Estate
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-11-12· cited 36×
• Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Smith
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-07-15· cited 7×