Skip to main content
· 7/21/1993

Dorothy SAMPLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 999 F.2d 1138
  • 1993 WL 269678

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[t]o prevail on this issue, then, the plaintiff must meet the requirements of newness, materiality and good cause.”
  • stating that “[t]o prevail on this issue, then, the plaintiff must meet the requirements of newness, materiality and good cause.”
  • emphasizing that a physician’s report derived from medical evidence already in the record did not constitute new information
  • evidence not “new” if already part of the record when the case was before the ALJ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Cudahy, Eschbach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.