Dorothy Quinn, Jacqueline Marchese and Nina Assajew v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the rule’s purpose “is to protect against the possibility that a party might secure a reversal on appeal in state court of the non-diverse party's dismissal producing renewed lack of complete diversity in the state court action”
• “[E]ven under the 1949 amendment to 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b), the involuntary dismissal of non-diverse parties does not make an action removable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).