Skip to main content
· 1/20/1997

Dorothy Marie Reeves, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, Randy J. Ungar, Intervenor v. Acromed Corp., Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees

Citations

  • 103 F.3d 442
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 799
  • 1997 WL 2524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that law of the case doctrine generally requires us to “follow the prior decisions in a case” (quotation omitted)
  • declining to revisit “decisions of legal questions” from a prior panel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Jolly, Dennis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.