Dorothy Hampton v. Leonard Thome

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a collective bargaining agreement that prevented employees who filed EEOC charges from using an arbitrated grievance process was a prohibited discriminatory policy
• holding that even where an employer “had no obligation to provide its employees with a right to grievance procedures at all,” it could not withhold them only from employees who filed EEOC charges
• finding retaliation in collective bargaining provision that provided that grievances could not proceed to arbitration if employee brings ADEA claim
• “The Board may not deny grievance proceedings on the basis that employees have filed protected ADEA claims.”
• “[I]t is well established that unions cannot waive employees’ ADEA or Title VII rights through collective bargaining.”
• “When charged with unlawful retaliation ..., an employer may offer a legitimate non-discriminatory reason for taking an adverse action against an employee who has engaged in protected activity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).