Dorothy Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Authority and Terry Peterson v. Daniel E. Levin and the Habitat Company Llc, Receivers-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “650+ conferencing hours” was not unreasonable and that “Defendants’ conclusory ‘too many hours’ allegations do not establish error”
• holding that the district court “did not abuse its discretion in concluding that [489 hours] spent on intra-team communications [over the course of two years] was compensable”
• “Use of one or more lawyer is a common practice, primarily because it often results in a more efficient distribution of work.”
• use of more than one lawyer “often results in a more efficient distribution of work”
• “Use of one or more lawyer is a common practice, primarily because it often results in a more efficient distribution of work.”
• “market rate is the rate that lawyers of similar ability and experience in the community normally charge their paying clients for the type of work in question”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).