Dorothy A. Wileman v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “‘[T]he employer has discretion to choose among equally qualified candidates provided the decision is not based upon unlawful criteria.’” (citing Texas Dep’t of Cmty. Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 253 (1981)
• “‘[T]he employer has discretion to choose among equally qualified candidates provided the decision is not based upon unlawful criteria.’” (citing Texas Dep’t of Cmty. Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 253 (1981)
• “In the unusual case where the district court[’s] . . . reasoning from the evidence adduced is so flawed as to constitute clear error, we, as a court of appeals, have a responsibility to correct that error.
• identical proof scheme applies to claim of sex discrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).