Dorn v. McTigue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting summary judgment to doctor on consumer protection claim because the plaintiff “failed to make a showing sufficient to establish the [doctor’s] alleged statement was motivated by entrepreneurial motives.”
• requiring the expert to provide “a specific and articulated basis for his expert opinion to survive summary judgment”
• doctors are merchants under the CPPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).