Dorman v. Township of Clinton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that preserving the residential nature of a neighborhood is a legitimate interest that may be advanced by a zoning regulation
• plaintiff who asserts denial of economically viable use of land must show that property was either unsuitable for use as zoned or unmarketable as zoned
• plaintiff who asserts denial of economically viable use of land must show that property was either unsuitable for use as zoned or unmarketable as zoned
• “[A]n owner may not base his or her claim for just compensation on uncertain and speculative expected profits.”
• the trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to allow the plaintiff to present an expert witness not disclosed until two months before trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).